The most artistic representation of this supreme truth, however is the sacred iconography of परमनान्द ताण्डव (paramanānda tāṇḍava – ferocious/frantic dance of supreme bliss) performed by ஸ்ரீ தில்லை சிதம்பர நடராஜர் (tilla cidambara naṭarājar). Yes, according to नाट्य शास्त्र (nāṭya śāstra – science of dance), the ताण्डव नृत्य (tāṇḍava nṛtya) is a special form of dance expressing the emotions of साहसिकता / रौद्र (sāhasikatā / raudra – ferocity/violence). However, at the same time the आनन्द नृत्य (ānanda nṛtya – blissful dance) depicts the emotions of आनन्द / शिव (ānanda / śiva – happiness or bliss). Structurally, upper part of the icon represents the आनन्दमय (ānandamaya - blissful) aspect of the கூத்து (kūttu – dance), whereas the lower part of the icon wherein His right foot forcefully crushes अपस्मारपुरुष / முயலகன் (apasmārapuruṣa / muyalagan) symbolizes its ताण्डव (tāṇḍava – frantic / wild) aspect.
For example, the philosophy behind the ஐம்பெருந்தொழில்கள் / पञ्चमहाकृत्यानि (aimperuntozhilgaL / pañcamahākṛtyāni – five-fold cosmic act) is one of the most important themes depicted by this iconography of ஸ்ரீ நடராஜமூர்த்தி தத்துவம் (srī naṭarājamūrtti tattuvam – philosophy underlying “king of dance” iconography). For more details on पञ्चमहाकृत्यानि (pañcamahākṛtyāni – five cosmic acts), please refer my (on left pane menu) discussions under the page titled
The next important point to understand is the close correspondence between the आनन्दताण्डव श्री नटराजस्य (ānandatāṇḍava śrī naṭarājasya – blissful dance of Noble Dance King) and the esoteric aspects of चिताकाश (citākāśa – gnostic vacuum) is highlighted in the छान्दोग्योपनिषद् (chāndogyopaniṣad) as part of the पञ्चाग्निविद्या (pañcāgnividyā – science of five fires) where it is stated thus:
As part of his भाष्य (bhāṣya - commentary) on the
above concept, श्री आदि शंकराचर्य भग्वत् पाद (śrī ādi śaṁkarācarya bhagvat pāda) further
elucidates the concept thus
In other words, the कं (kaṁ) symbolizing the sacred आनन्द (ānanda -
bliss) has close correspondence with the concept of खं (khaṁ) symbolizing आकाश (ākāśa - space / vacuum) and both of
them, in turn, corresponds to ब्रह्म (brahma - god). This
synergy is what is very beautifully depicted in the आनन्दताण्डव श्री नटराज मूर्तेः (ānandatāṇḍava
śrī naṭarāja mūrteḥ – blissful dance iconography of lord of dance).
Interestingly, the motif of शिव ताण्डव (śiva tāṇḍava - Siva’s Dance), is not only known
for its deep metaphysical significance, but is also very widely acknowledged
among the scientific community including stalwarts like Carl
Sagan, Fritjof Capra etc., for its underlying scientific basis. In
fact, the prestigious European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN),
for instance has installed an instance of this sacred icon, in its campus,
thereby acknowledging its scientific message
In fact, according to Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, the eminent scholar and subject matter expert on Indian Arts, in his famous essay titled “The Dance of Siva”, glorifies this iconography thus
“How many various dances of Shiva are known to His worshipers I cannot say. No doubt the root idea behind all of these dances is more or less one and the same, the manifestation of primal rhythmic energy. Whatever the origins of Shiva's dance, it became in time the clearest image of the activity of God which any art or religion can boast of”.
Thus, this also day is celebrated as the महा अवतार दिन (mahā avatāra dina – grand manifestation day) of ஸ்ரீ நடராஜர்( sri nataraajar - lord of the cosmic dance) – the dancing form of रुद्र शिव (rudra śiva). ஸ்ரீ உமாபதி சிவாச்சாரியார் (sri umaapathi sivaachariyaar) in his magnum opus கோயிற்புராணம் (kOyiRpuraaNam) very categorically states the significance of this event
According to orthodox legends, it is widely believed that such ताण्डव (tāṇḍava - dance) was originally witnessed by श्री पार्वतीदेवी (śrī pārvatīdevī) - His
Divine Consort, and also by many ऋषि मुन्यः (ṛṣi munyaḥ - seer sages) along with their धर्म पत्न्यः (dharma patnyaḥ - divine consorts) in
the sacred forests दारुवन (dāruvana – pine forest), as explained in the திருப்பத்தூர் புராணம் (tirupattūr purāṇam)
The following
narration by Kamil V Zvelebil concisely summarizes the episode thus,
“In the forest of Dāruvana, “heretic” sages practiced their austerities and sacrifices without truly loving and serving Shiva. Therefore, Shiva in the guise of a young handsome ascetic went there, accompanied by Vishnu whom he ordered to adopt the form of a beautiful courtesan and seduce the rishis – which Vishnu did most successfully, Shiva as the handsome young mendicant, aroused the passion of the wives of the sages, and seduced them one by one. The two gods were then followed by the Rishis and their wives, each apart, and when they met in the midst of the forest, the sages saw their naked impassioned wives and were shocked. They went into cancel and found out that the two seducers were none else than Shiva and Vishnu; and full of hatred against Shiva as the instigator of the plot, the sough to kill him. They prepared a sacrifice out of which emerged first a huge tiger; but Shiva destroyed the beast and wrapped the skin around his waist. Then a trident emerged to kill the god; but Shiva grasped it firmly in his hand. Then a furious antelope emerged to gore him; but Shiva took it in his left arm.Then a great numner of snakes were created to attack him; but he took them into his hair as ornaments. Subsequently a host of demons followed; but he ordered them to be his servants. Next a horrid grinning skull appeared; but Shiva set it into his crown of hair. Then the rshis created a drum (damru, tuti) which they hurled with a deafening sound against the god, but he caught it and held it firmly in one of his hands. Finally, they produced a demoniac dwarf as the embodiment of evil, called Muyalaka alias Apsāmarapuruṣa, ‘The man without memory’, and a scorching flame in addition, but Siva took the fire into his hand, and stepped on the back of the dwarf breaking his neck. And then he began to dance, and the whole universe trembled, because it was vigorous heroic tandava dance. After the dance, the sages, totally converted, fell at the god’s feet, but Shiva left the forest and returned to mount Kailaasha”.
This story is elaborately explained in the चितंबर महात्म्य (citambaramahātmya) and also by the
revered saint श्री उमापति शिवाचार्य (śrī umāpati śivācārya) in his கோயிற்புராணம் (koyiRpuraaNam), both of which
are considered to be the most authentic स्थल पुराण (sthala
purāṇa – temple legend) of the sacred shrine. When आदिशेष (ādiśeṣa) heard of the glory of
this dance, he also wanted to experience the same and thus prayed to his
beloved lord महा विष्णु (mahā viṣṇu) who directed
him to go to the sacred city of சிதம்பரம் (chidambaram) and pray to परमशिव (paramaśiva) and by महऋषि पतङ्जलि (mahaṛṣi
patañjali) & महऋषि व्याघ्रपाद (mahaṛṣi vyaghrapāda) at the holy city
of சிதம்பரம் (chidambaram). The
revered Saiva saint श्री उमापति शिवाचार्य (śrī umāpati śivācārya) in his
masterpiece कुञ्चिताङ्घ्रि स्तव (kuñcittāñghri stava) eulogizes this
event thus,
Similarly, श्री रामबद्रदीक्षित (śrī rāmabadradīkṣita) provides the following
account in his famous text called "पतञ्जलिचरित (patañjalicarita -
story of patanjali)" further
testifies thus:
Sri Sivaramamurthi in his famous book - Nataraja
in Art, Thought and Literature, explains the above verses thus:
"As Siva dances with the Universe as his theme, he almost tets fall the curtain of illusion, mystifying the Samnaea's, when soon he reveals the truth to Patanjali, Vyaharapada and other Rishis. 'This is the illusion of the world as you see it. here, and you will now know the eternal truth of the Supreme Brahman immanent, beginning-less, eternal , sentient and blissful, unending and monastic."
The सगुणब्रह्मन् (saguṇa brahman – Personal God) is
manifested in dual modes viz. आत्म रूप (ātma rūpa – subtle/spiritual form) and பூத உருவம் / भूतरूप (bhUtha uruvam / bhūtarūpa – physical form). Moreover,
the विग्रह (vigraha - idol) consecrated
in a temple, basically represents the latter form. Again, such विग्रह (vigraha - idol), takes one or more of
any of these three structural forms viz.
निष्कलं / அருவம் (niṣkalaṁ / aruvam- formless/abstract),
शकल-निष्कलं /அருவுருவம் (śakala niṣkalaṁ / aruvuruvam – formless/non anthropomorphic form) &
शकल / உருவம் (śakala / uruvam – anthropomorphic form)
This fact is explained by शुद्धाद्वैत शैव सिद्धान्त दर्शन (śuddhādvaita
śaiva siddhānta darśana – philosophy of pure
nondualstic final auspicious accomplishment).
The परमेश्वर तत्त्व (parameśvara tattva – supreme lordship
principle) which is the सगुण ब्रह्मन् / शकलशिव (saguṇa brahman / śakalaśiva – divinity having qualities
/ fractional god) is manifested in dual modes viz.
आत्म रूप (ātma rūpa – subtle/ spiritual form) and
பூத உருவம் / भूतरूप (bhUtha uruvam / bhūtarūpa – physical form).
The विग्रह (vigraha - idol) consecrated in a temple, basically represents
the latter form. Again, as explained by அருள் நந்தி சிவனார் (aruL nandhi sivanaar) in his சிவ ஞான சித்தியர் (siva
gnaana sidhdhiyar), such विग्रह (vigraha - idol), takes one or more of any of these three structural forms
viz.
निष्कलं / அருவம் (niṣkalaṁ / aruvam - formless/ abstract),
शकल निष्कलं /அருவுருவம் (śakala niṣkalaṁ / aruvuruvam – formless/non anthropomorphic form) &
शकल / உருவம் (śakala / uruvam – anthropomorphic form)
नवविधबेधाः / நவந்தரு பேதங்கள் (navavidhabedhāḥ / navantharu nilaigaL– ninefold differences)
Again, in Saivism, these structural forms exists in नवविधबेधाः / நவந்தரு பேதங்கள் (navavidhabedhāḥ / navantharu nilaigaL– ninefold differences) viz. परमशिव (paramaśiva – supreme aupisciousness), पराशक्ति (parāśaktii – supreme energy), परनाद (paranāda – supreme wave), परबिन्दु (parabindu – supreme particle), मन्त्रमहेश्वर / सदाशिव (mantramaheśvara/sadāśiva - theosonic eternal auspisciousness), मन्त्रेश्वर /महेश्वर (mantreśvara/maheśvara - theosonic supreme divinity), ब्रह्म /सृष्टिकर्तृ (brahma/ sṛṣṭikartṛ– brahma / creator), विष्णु / रक्षक (viṣṇu /rakṣaka – Vishnu / protector), रुद्र / हर (rudra / hara – rudra / destroyer), as testified by saint திருமூலர் (tirumūlar) in the following verses
Again, in the famous वातुलशुद्धागम (vātulaśuddhāgama), the निष्कल शिव (niṣkala śiva – seedless
shiva) is referred as परशिव (paraśiva – abstract
shiva), शकल निष्कल शिव (śakalaniṣkala śiva –formless form shiva) as सदाशिव (sadāśiva) and the शकल शिव (śakala śiva) as महेश / महेश्वर शिव (maheśa maheśvara śiva) respectively. The following verses from the text
testifies the same
Similarly, in the sacred texts like पूर्वकामिकागम (pūrvakāmikāgama), these three are called अव्यक्तं (avyaktaṁ - unclear / unmanifest), व्यक्ताव्यक्तं (vyaktāvyaktaṁ - clear-unclear) & व्यक्तं (vyaktaṁ - clear) respectively. Interestingly, the temple at சிதம்பரம் (chitambaram), portrays all these three forms in the same temple viz. अकाशतत्त्व (ākāśatattva – vacuum principle), स्फ्टिकलिङ्ग (sphaṭika liṅga) & நடராஜர் (nadaraajar) respectively.
The table below summarizes the नवविधबेधाः / நவந்தரு பேதங்கள் (navavidhabedhāḥ / navantharu nilaigaL– ninefold differences) depicted above
உருவ வகைகள் (uruva vagaigaL - structural forms) | நவந்தரு பேதங்கள் ( navantharu bedhangaL– ninefold differences) | உருவ வகைகள் (uruva vagaigaL - structural forms) at சிதம்பரம் (Chitambaram) |
अव्यक् / निष्कलं / அருவம் (avyakta / niṣkalaṁ / aruvam - formless/ abstract) | 1. परमशिव / பரமசிவன் (paramaśiva / paramasivan – supreme auspiciousness) 2. पराशक्ति /பராசக்தி (parāśakti /parāsakti – supreme energy) 3. परनाद / பரநாதம்(paranāda / paranādam – supreme wave) 4. परबिन्दु / பரபிந்து (parabindu / parabindhu – supreme particle) | अकाश तत्त्व (ākāśa tattva – vacuum principle) |
व्यक्ताव्यक्त / शकल निष्कलं / அருவுருவம் (vyaktāvyakta / śakalaniṣkalaṁ /aruvuruvam – formless/non anthromorphic form) & | 5. मन्त्रमहेश्वर / सदाशिवलिङ्ग /மந்திரமகேஷ்வர சதாசிவலிங்கம் (mantramaheśvara/sadāśivaliṅga / mantira mageśvaran / sadhāśiva lingam - theosonic eternal auspiciousness) | स्फटिक लिङ्ग (sphaṭika liṅga) |
व्यक्त / शकल / உருவம் (vyakta / śakala / uruvam – anthromorphic form) | 6. मन्त्रेश्वर /महेश्वर / மந்திரேவரன் / மகேஷ்வரன்(mantreśvara/maheśvara / mantireśvaran /mageśvaran - Supreme Lord) 7. ब्रह्म /सृष्टिकर्तृ /பிரமன் / படைப்பவன் (brahma/ sṛṣṭikartṛ / biraman / paḍaiipavan – creator) 8. विष्णु / रक्षक / விஷ்ணு / காப்பவன் (viṣṇu /rakṣaka / viṣṇu kāppavan – protector), 9. रुद्र / हर / ருத்திரன் / ஹரன்(rudra / hara / ruddhiran / haran – destroyer) | நடராஜர் (nadaraajar) |
This is also why, தில்லை சிதம்பர நடராஜர் கோயில் (tillai cidambara naṭarājar kOyil) is given the
highest importance even among all the தேவார பாடல் பெற்ற ஸ்தலங்கள் (dEvāra pāḍal peṛṛa stalangaḻ). In fact,
according to orthodox convention the very term கோயில் (KOyil - temple) is used as a
synonym for தில்லை சிதம்பர நடராஜர் கோயில் (tillai cidambara naṭarājar kOyil) by default.
The prominence given to this shrine can be understood from the following verses
from சிதம்பர செய்யுட் கோவை (cidambara seiyut kOvai) written by the revered
saint தவத்திரு குமரகுருபர அடிகளார் (tavattiru kumaragurubara aḍigaḻār)
Similarly, திருஅருட்பிரகாச இரமாலிங்க வள்ளலார் (tiru aruṭpirakāsa iramāliṅga vaḻḻalār) also in his mystic ecstasy, goes to the extent of singing thus,
Again, the noble child saint poet திருஞானசம்பந்தர் (tirujñānasambandar) very
categorically declares that he does not desire anything in this world more than
the Holy Feet of Lord தில்லை நடராஜர் (tillai naṭarājar)
In the beautiful பதிகம் (padhikam – canto) called பெரிய திருத்தாண்டகம் (periya thiruththaaNdagam), the noble saint திரு நாவுகரசர் (thiru naavukarasar), very categorically declares, பெரும்பற்றுபுலியூரானைப் பேசாத நாளெல்லாம் பிறவா நாளே (perumpaṛṛupuliyūrānaip pEsāda nāḻellām piṛavā nāḻE - Unlived indeed are the days unspent in praise of Lord Perumppatrapuliyur). The beginning verses of the same is quoted here
சிதம்பரமும் திருவரங்கமும் (cidambaramum thiruvaraṅgamum)
Interestingly, in line with the शैवसंप्रदाय (śaivasaṃpradāya
– saivaite tradition) discussed above, in the श्री वैष्णव
संप्रदाय (śrī vaiṣṇava saṃpradāya) also, the term கோயில் (KOyil - temple), by
default, refers to திருவரங்கம் (tiruvarangam -
Srirangam) - which is considered
to be the foremost temples among the 108 दिव्यदेशाः (divyadeśāḥ - Divine Spaces). Just as the former, this temple has been highly
glorified by திவ்ய பிரபந்த பாசுரங்கள் (divya pirabanda pāsuraṅgaḻ) composed
by the ஆழ்வார்கள் (āzhvārgaḻ). For example, the
revered saint திருபானாழ்வார் (tirupānāzhvār) in his famous
masterpiece அமலனாதிபிரான் (amalādhipirān), sings thus,
Again, the famous verses by saint தொண்டரடிப்பொடி ஆழ்வார் (toṇḍaraḍippoḍiyāzhvār) in his famous பாசுரம் (pāsuram) called திருமாலை (thirumālai – sacred garland) sings thus,
In fact, the term திருவரங்கம் (tiruvaraṅgam), is derived from the terms திரு (tiru – divine) & அரங்கம் (araṅgam- stage). Moreover, the chief presiding deity महा विश्णु (mahā
viśṇu) is called அரங்கனாதன் (araṅganātan – lord of stage), exactly corresponding to the Saivite term சபாபதி (sabāpati – lord of hall). While, at திருவரங்கம் (tiruvaraṅgam), the static (potential) aspect of Divinity is highlighted by
showcasing the God in sleeping position, at சிதம்பரம் (chidambaram), the focus is on the dynamic (kinetic) aspect of Divinity
showcased as the கூத்தபிரான் (kūttapirān - dancing god). Thus, fundamentally, in principle, both वैष्णव च शैव संप्रदायौ (vaiṣṇava
ca śaiva saṃpradāyau – saivaite and Vaishnavaite traditions) share a common theme with respect to the underlying
philosophy of temples.
Interestingly, the கோவிந்தராஜ பெருமாள் (govindarāja perumāḻ) at the திருசித்திரகூடம் திருகோயில் (tiru cittirakūḍam tirukkOyil) within the campus of தில்லை சிதம்பர நடராஜர் கோயில் (tillai cidambaram naṭarājar kOyil), also represents the சயன / கிடந்த கோலம் (sayana / kiḍanda kOlam – sleeping
pose) of Lord महाविष्णु (mahāviṣṇu), similar to
the அரங்கனாதன் (araṅganātan) at திருவரங்கம் (tiruvaraṅgam). In fact, திருசித்திரகூடம் திருகோயில் (tiru cittirakūḍam tirukkOyil) is also one of among the 108 திவ்ய தேசங்கள் (divya dEsaṅgaḻ - sacred spaces) on which the திருமங்கை ஆழ்வார் (tirumaṅgai āzhvār), as well as, குலசேகராழ்வார் (kulasEkarāhvār) have both
(independently) performed மங்கலாசசனம் (mangalaasaasanam) by composing around 32 திவ்ய பிரபந்த பாசுரங்கள் (dhivya pirabandha paasurangaL) glorifying the
deity.
According to orthodox legend it was திருசித்திரகூடம் திருகோயில் (tiru cittirakūḍam tirukkOyil) the competitive dance between the
divine couple viz. परमशिव (paramaśiva) and his beloved
consort शिवकामी (śivakāmī) was performed, while महाविष्णु (mahāviṣṇu) who was
witnessing the same, as a presiding judge. Earlier, a similar competition
between this couple was conducted at திருவால்ங்காடு (tiruvālaṅgādu) where परमशिव (paramaśiva) had performed
the ऊर्ध्व ताण्डव (ūrdhva tāṇḍava) on the இரத்தின சபை (iratna sabai – pearl hall) which was witnessed by Lord ब्रह्म (brahma). However,
as ब्रह्म (brahma) said he was
unable to decide who was a better dancer between the two, requested महाविष्णु (mahāviṣṇu) to provide the
judgement. And accordingly, the competition was conducted once again, but now
on the பொற்சபை (poṛsabai – golden hall) at சிதம்பரம் (cidambaram) as witnessed by கோவிந்தராஜ பெருமாள் (govindarāja perumāḻ).
This திருசித்திரகூடம் சன்னிதி (tiru cittirakūḍam sannidhi) is strategically located
in the निरृति दिक् / நிருதி திசை (nirṛti dik / niruthi thisai) just in front of the சித்சபை (chit sabai), silently witnessing
the परमानन्द ताण्डव (paramānanda tāṇḍava – dance of supreme
bliss) performed by கூத்தபிரான் (kUththapiraan - dancing lord) also called as நடராஜ ராஜர் (naṭarājarājar – emperor amongst royyal dancers). I strongly
feel, these shrines were so designed (located) only to highlight the underlying हरि हर अभेद (hari-hara abheda – nondifference between Hari & Hara). In fact, it is
here, the revered saint श्री अप्पय दीक्षित (śrī appayya dīkṣita) sings the
famous हरिहर स्तुति (harihara
stuti) only to drive home this message of theological harmony underlying
these two देवत (devata - deities). Similarly, the honourable Tamil Siddha
saint சிவவாக்கியர் (sivavākkiyar) also very strongly
reiterates this point by singing thus,
Interestingly, similar examples highlighting the சைவ-வைணவ ஐக்கியம் (saivavaiṇava aikkiyam) is a common
theme in the conceptual design of many ancient शिवालय (śivālaya –
Shiva temples) including the ancient சித்திரம் (sittiram – painting) on the தெற்க்கு சுவர் (teṛkku suvar – south wall) of ஆடகேசுவர சபை (āḍakEsuvara sabai – Lord of Dance Hall), depicting महाविष्णु (mahāviṣṇu) in His சயன / கிடந்த திரு கோலம் (sayana /
kidandha thiru kOlam –sacred sleeping pose) in front of the தியாகேசர் (tiyāgEsar – Lord of Sacrifice) at the famous திருவாரூர் திருகோயில் (tiruvārūr tirukOyil). Besides
this, महाविष्णु (mahāviṣṇu) in His நின்ற திரு கோலம் (ninṛa tiru kOlam –sacred standing pose), is also
consecrated on the north-facing back wall of தியாகேசர் சன்னிதி (tiyaagEsar sannidhi – shrine of Lord of Sacrifice) in the same temple.
Incidentally, the nature of திருகூத்து (tirukkūttu – sacred dance) performed by the ஆட வல்லான் (aada
vallaan – master of dances), this temple is considered as
His अजप ताण्डव (ajapa tāṇḍava – dance of unstruck sound). Again, in the
sacred city of திருவெண்காடு / स्वेदारण्य (tiruveṇkāḍu
/ svedāraṇya) popularly glorified as ஆதி சிதம்பரம் (ādi chidambaram) also has महाविष्णु (mahāviṣṇu) posed in
His நின்ற திரு கோலம் (ninRa thiru kOlam –sacred standing pose) installed the निरृति दिक् / நிருதி திசை (nirṛti dik / niruthi thisai) of the நடராஜர் சன்னிதி (nataraajar sannidhi)
Thus, we can easily observe that in many பாடல் பெற்ற சிவாலயங்கள் (pāḍal peṛṛa sivālayaṅgaḻ) particularly those wherein நடராஜர் சன்னிதி (naṭarājar sannidi)). is special, such concept of சைவ வைணவ ஐக்கியம் (saivavaiṇava aikkiyam) has become an integral part of temple design. From a metaphysical point of view, this is because, in principle, the நடராஜர் தத்துவம் (naṭarājar tattuvam – concept of naṭarājar) itself implies such a synergy. It beautifully depicts the synergy between the கூத்தன் (kūttan - dancer) and His கூத்து (kūttu - dance). In metaphysical terms, the former represents the principle of eternal being, while the latter the eternal becoming. Both are two sides of the same coin – the passive and active principles conventionally theologized as शिव (śiva) & शक्ति (śakti) respectively. According to certain legends, the शक्ति तत्त्व (śakti tattva – kinetic principle) is mapped to the विष्णु तत्त्व (viṣṇu tattva) who had once taken the मोहिनी अवतार (mohinī avatāra – female incarnation), as observed earlier. I am only reminded of the following verses from பொன்வன்னத்து அந்தாதி (ponvannattu antāti) sung by the mystic saint poet சேரமான் பெருமாள் நாயனார் (sEramān perumāḻ nāyanār)
Interestingly, with respect to நடராஜர் தத்துவம் (naṭarājar tattuvam – concept of nataraja) the roles between these two deities viz. शिव (śiva)& विष्णु (viṣṇu) seems to be reversed. Here, unlike tradition convention, the former represents the dynamic role (who is eternally vibrant as a dancer), while the latter represents the passive role (who is silently witnessing in योग निष्ट (yoga niṣṭa – meditative trance). Probably the two deities decided to swap their roles! The essential अभेद (abheda – non-difference) between शिव (śiva) & विष्णु (viṣṇu) is also testified very emphatically in the sacred scriptures. In the श्री विष्णु सहस्रनाम (śrī viṣṇu sahasranāma), for example, शिव (śiva) is incorporated as one of the नाम (nāma - name) and thereby a गुण विष्णौ (guṇa viṣṇau – aspect of Vishnu). His holiness, जगत्गुरु श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत् पाद (jagatguru śrī ādi śaṁkarācārya bhagavat pāda) in his famous भाष्यम् (bhāṣyam - commentary) on the above scripture, elaborately deals with this concept by providing various शब्द प्रमाण (śabda pramāṇa - scriptural testimonies). He, for instance, quotes from the कैवल्य उपणिशद् (kaivalya upaṇiśad) by arguing thus,
He even goes to the extent of saying those
sectarians who start-promoting differences between these deities is nothing
short of blasphemy and hence will be severely punished for their sin. He quotes
from the भविष्य पुराण (bhaviṣya purāṇa).
The philosophical theme on हरिहर अभेद (harihara abheda) can
be further extended to include all the three stakeholders in the dance
viz. கூத்தன் (kūttan–dancer) theologized
as शिव (śiva), the
actual கூத்து (kūttu- dance) theologized
as शक्ति (śakti) and
the காண்பவன் / சாட்சி (kāṇbavan / sātci - observer /
witness) theologized as विष्णु (viṣṇu). Holistically
speaking, all these three entities are part and parcel of the same absolute. I
am only reminded of the following verses from அற்புத திருவந்தாதி (aṛpuda tiruvandādi) sung
by the mystic saint poet, holy mother காரைக்கால் அம்மையார் (kāraikāl ammaiyār)
Thus far, in the above paragraphs, how the நடராஜர் தத்துவம் (nataraajar taththuvam – concept of nataraja) beautifully synthesizes the parallel मद संप्रदायाः (mada saṁpradāyāḥ - religious traditions) viz. शैव (śaiva), वैष्णव (vaiṣṇava) & शाक्त (śākta) into its core philosophy. Moreover, by making the पञ्च महा कृत्य (pañca mahā kṛtya – five supreme functions) an integral part of its design, it has even more emphasized the underlying अभेद (abheda – non difference) between these theologies.
“How many various dances of Shiva are known to His worshipers I cannot say. No doubt the root idea behind all of these dances is more or less one and the same, the manifestation of primal rhythmic energy. Whatever the origins of Shiva's dance, it became in time the clearest image of the activity of God which any art or religion can boast of… Nataraja is the noblest symbolism of Supreme Power. He is a synthesis of Scence, Religion and Art.How amazing the range of thought and sympathy of those rishi-artists who first conceived such a type as this, affording an image of reality, a key to the complex tissue of life, a theory of nature, not merely satisfactory to a single clique or race, nor acceptable to the thinkers of one century only, but universal in its appeal to the philosopher, the lover, and the artist of all ages and all countries. How supremely great in power and grace this dancing image must appear to all those who have striven in plastic forms to give expression to their intuition of Life!
In these days of specialization, we are not accustomed to such a synthesis of thought; but for those who ‘saw‘ such images as this, there could have been no division of life and thought into water-tight compartments. Not do we always realize, when we criticise the merits of individual works, the full extent of the creative power which, to borrow a musical analogy, could discover a mode so expressive of fundamental rhythms and so profoundly significant and inevitable. Every part of such an image as this is directly expressive, not of any were superstition or dogma, but of evident facts. No artist of today, however great, could more exactly or more wisely create an image of that Energy which science must postulate behind all phenomena.”
Let us take a closer look at the iconography of नटराजमूर्ति (naṭarājamūrti 0 – lord of dance iconography) and try to understand its underlying esoteric meanings. By its very design, every स्वरूपस्यभाग (svarūpasyabhāga– part of its natural form) reveals a metaphysical secret.
# | भाग (bhāga – part) | Description |
1 | மயில் இறகு (mayil thOgai – peacock feathers) | The மயில் இறகு (mayil thOgai – peacock feather) is not only an aesthetic symbol of elegance and beauty but in occult terms, as explained by Dr. Y Dakshinamurthi, it also symbolizes மேல்செல் உயிர் (meLsel – ascending soul) reflecting an ancient spiritual practice. |
கொக்கிறகு (kokkiRagu – egret feather) | ||
¦¸¡ý¨È ÁÄ÷ (konRai malar - Cassia Fistula / golden shower) | ||
2 | जटा (jaṭā – knot of matter hair) | |
3 | यज्ञोपवित (yajñopavita – sacred thread) | It represents the कुण्डलिनी शक्ती (kuṇḍalinī śaktī) |
4 | गङ्ग (gaṅga – river goddess) | Flow of grace |
5 | पत्रकुण्डल (patrakuṇḍala - twisted golden palm leaf in the left ear-lobe ) | There is a स्त्री कुण्डलम् (strī kuṇḍalam – feamle ring) on the left ear representing the शक्ति तत्त्व (śakti tattva – female principle) of अर्धनारीश्वर(ardhanārīśvara) |
6 | मकरकुण्डल (makarakuṇḍala – crockodile ear lobe on right ear) | This reperesents the शिव तत्त्व (śiva tattva – male principle) of अर्धनारीश्वर (ardhanārīśvara) |
7 | þÇõ À¢¨È / इन्दुदल (iLam piRai / indudala – crescent moon) | The अर्धेन्दु (ardhendu - crescent moon) as on the पञ्चमि तिति (pañcami titi – fifth lunar day), symbolizing the concept of time. |
8 | अर्धचन्द्र हस्त मुद्रा (ardhacandra hasta mudrā – tongue of flame) | The upper left palm holds the தீயகல் (thIyagal – fire light) representing प्रलयाग्नि (pralayāgni – fire of dissolution) in the shape of अर्धचन्द्र (archachandra – half moon) |
9 | डमरु हस्त (ḍamaru hasta – hand with drum) | The ÐÊ / डमरु (thudi / ḍamaru – drum) symbolizes the नाद स्पन्दन / शब्द ब्रह्मन् (nāda spandana / śabda brahman) |
10 | अभय हस्त मुद्रा (abhaya hasta mudrā – fear not symbol) | The lower front right arm holds the अभय मुद्रा (abhaya hasta mudrā – fear not gesture) |
11 | गज हस्त मुद्रा (gaja hasta mudrā – elephant hand pose) | Symbolizes Lord गनेश / विग्नेष्वर (ganeśa / vigneṣvara) – the removal of obstacles. |
12 | கமல பீடம் / पद्म पीठ (kamala pIdam / padma pīṭha – lotus pedestal) | |
13 | உதர பந்தம் (udhara bandham) | |
14 | புலியுரி (puliyuri) | |
15 | திருவாசி சுடர்/ प्रभमण्डल (thiruvaasi sudar / prabhamaṇḍala – ring of flames) | The திருவாசி (thiruvaasi) represents the हिरण्यगर्ब (hiraṇyagarba – golden womb / cosmic egg) or the boundry condition wherein the sacred திருவிலையாடல் (thiruvilaiyaadal - divine game) of महा माया (mahā māyā – cosmic illusion) is enacted. प्रभमण्डल (prabhamaṇḍala – ring of flames) not only forms a ornamental decoration around நடராஜ மூர்த்தி (nataraaja mUrththi) but also symbolizes the ध्वनि / बीज मन्त्र (dhvani / bīja mantra) |
Dr. Ramachandran Nagaswamy the
eminent archaeologist, epigraphist and historian in the following video gives a
very detailed account of the iconography
The fact
that the आनन्दताण्डव श्री नटराजस्य (ānandatāṇḍava
śrī naṭarājasya – blissful dance of Lord Nataraja) symbolizes
a cosmological dance is very categorically testified by saint திருமூலர்(tirumūlar) in the
following verses
तत्त्वविद्या नाट्यस्य (tattvavidyā nāṭyasya – philosophy of dance)
Thus, we can notice that the symbology
of नाट्य (nāṭya – dance) has become an integral part of not only the शैव
ज्ञानपाद संप्रदाय (śaiva jñānapāda saṃpradāya – Shaiva wisdom-path tradition) but can in fact be observed across the length and breath of Indian
spiritual tradition. The important point to recongnize is that this symbology
has deeper occult yogic significance, about which we shall quickly take a
bird’s eye-view particularly taking भरतनाट्यम् (bharatanāṭyam) one of the most ancient forms of classical dances in the Indian soil
having deep spiritual connects especially in the context of the நடராஜ தத்துவம் (naṭarāja tattuvam – dance-king philosophy),
that we have been discussing about.
According to भरतनाट्यशास्त्र (bharatanāṭyaśāstra – dance
scripture of bharata) which was
originally revealed by श्री नटराज (śrī naṭarāja) Himself to the noble sage श्री भरतमुनि (śrī bharatamuni) through नन्दिकेश्वर (nandikeśvara) who is also identified as तण्डु महऋषि (taṇḍu mahaṛṣi) by many subject matter experts including आचार्य श्री अभिनवगुप्त (ācārya śrī abhinavagupta), who, for example, in his अभिनवभारती (abhinavabhāratī) which is his famous भाष्य (bhāṣya - commentary) on the above text, very categorically declares:
भावम् /பாவம் (bhāvam - expression), रागम् /ராகம் (rāgam - tune) & तालम् /தாளம் (tālam / tāḷam - beat) constitute the three indispensable parts of भरतनाट्य (bharatanāṭya) and according
to some subject matter experts the term भरत /பரத (bharata) is actually an acromym by taking the குறில் வடிவம் (kuṟil vaṭivam – short form) of the
first syllables from each of these three terms viz. ‘भ/ப
(ba)’, ‘’र/ர (ra)’ & ‘त/த (ta)’ respectively.
Philosophically, this is a very important concept for us to understand
in order to better appreciate the role of dance in spirituality. Please be
noted that sometimes रसम् /ரசம் (rasam – flavor / sentiment) replaces रागम्/ராகம் (rāgam - tune) when it comes to mapping ‘’र/ர (ra)’ in the
acronym भरत /பரத (bharata). For example,
Similarly,
the technical aspect of the term नाट्य (nāṭya) is also important for us to
understand. In the context of भरतनाट्य (bharatanāṭya),
the term नाट्य (nāṭya) is used in a wider sense to
holistically include all the three similar but not the same aspects of नृत्य (nṛtya
- gesticulation), नृत्त (nṛtta –
dancing / acting) & नाट्यनाटक (nāṭyanāṭaka
– dance-drama) into a holistically integrated form of fine art. Let us
understand the subtle technicaly differences between these terms, as
highlighted by subject matter experts. नृत्त (nṛtta –
dancing / acting), according to experts like श्री धनञ्जय (śrī
dhanañjaya) who has written the famous treatise on Indian Dramaturgy
called दशरूपक (daśarūpaka),
is based on तालम् /தாளம் (tālam
/ tāḷam -
beat) & लयम् /லயம் (layam -
repose), while नृत्य (nṛtya
- gesticulation) which
is etymologically derived from नृत् (nṛt – to throw) and
here in this context is interpreted with गात्रविक्षेप (gātravikṣepa
– throwing of limbs) in tune with some भावम् /பாவம் (bhāvam –
mood / emotion) & रसम् /ரசம் (rasam
– flavor / sentiment). Similarly, both the terms नाट्य (nāṭya) & नाटक (nāṭaka
– drama) are etymologically derived from
the same root ‘नट (naṭa – to quiver)’ which is kind of a अवस्पन्दन / किञ्चित्चलन (avaspandana
/ kiñcitcalana – mild vibration / throb). In a nutshell, the term नाट्य (nāṭya) assumed a wider role to include नाटक (nāṭaka
– drama) as well and these terms are no longer water-tight in their
practical usage. For example, श्री भरतमुनि (śrī
bharatamuni) in his नाट्यशास्त्र (nāṭyaśāstra
– dance scripture) which is sometimes eulogized as नाट्यवेद (nāṭyaveda) lists out almost 11 key ingredients
making up नाट्य (nāṭya)
With this basic
understanding about the art and science of नाट्य (nāṭya - dance), we shall next try to understand the esoteric philosophy
underlying the same नाट्य (nāṭya - dance) which involves an harmonic synchronization not only
between different forms of fine arts including இயல் (iyal -
poetics), இசை (isai - music) & நாடகம் (nāṭakam
- drama) and that is why these three are considered three
inseparable parts of the Tamil Language.
As shown in
the above picture, in the evolution of human spiritual intelligence, नाट्य / நாட்டியம் (nāṭya /
nāṭṭiyam - dance) is considered to be highest expression of artistic genius
is a holistic balancing act evoving from absolute silence to poetic musical
expression of artistic नाट्यनाटक (nāṭyanāṭaka
– dance-drama) and whose highest theologization is the प्रतिकाविद्या नटराजस्य (pratikāvidyā
naṭarājasya – iconography of Nataraja).
This fact is very beautifully expressed by ஸ்ரீ சாத்தனார் (srī
sāttaṉār) in his
famous poetic treatise கூத்தநூல் (kūttanūl – dance scripture)
In the picture below, I have attempted to provide a visual
summary of the above listed stages in the evolution of creative fine arts and
its epitome of excellence perfecting in the conception of प्रतिकाविद्या नटराजस्य (pratikāvidyā naṭarājasya –
iconography of Nataraja).
The important point to
remember is that இயல் (iyal - poetics), இசை (isai -
music) & நாடகம் (nāṭakam - drama) form an integral foundation for नाट्य (nāṭya - dance) which we can loosely map
to भावम् / பாவம் (bhāvam - expression), रागम् /ராகம் (rāgam - tune) & तालम् /தாளம் (tālam / tāḷam - beat) respectively, which as we discussed earlier forms the essence of भरतनाट्य (bharatanāṭya).
Similarly, according to कर्नाटक सङ्गीतम् (karnāṭaka saṅgītam – Carnatic music), there is a similar Holy Trinity viz. पल्लवि (pallavi – thematic line), रागम् /ராகம் (rāgam - tune) & तालम् /தாளம் (tālam / tāḷam - beat) respectively. In fact, they are like the three spatial dimensions viz.
length, width and height, corresponding to any physical object.
#
Category
प्रथम विमा (prathama vimā –
first dimension)
द्वितीय विमा (dvitīya vimā –
second dimension)
तृतीय विमा (tṛtīya vimā –
third dimension)
1
தமிழ் இலக்கியம் (tamiḻ ilakkiyam – Tamil literature)
நாடகம் (nāṭakam - drama)
இசை (isai - music)
இயல் (iyal - poetics)
2
भरतनाट्य (bharatanāṭya)
तालम् /தாளம் (tālam / tāḷam - beat)
नृत्य / ஆட்டம் (nṛtya / āṭṭam - dance)
रसम् /ரசம் (rasam – flavor / sentiment)
सङ्गीत / பாட்டம் (saṅgīta/ pāṭṭam - song)
भावम् /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood / emotion)
अभिनय / அவிநயம் (abhinaya
/ avinayam - expression)
3
कर्नाटक सङ्गीतम् (karnāṭaka saṅgītam – Carnatic music)
तालम् /தாளம் (tālam / tāḷam - beat)
रागम् /ராகம் /பண் (rāgam
/ paṇ - tune)
पल्लवि (pallavi – thematic line)
4
இயல் (iyal - poetics)
वर्ण (varṇa - letter)
रसम् /ரசம் (rasam – flavor / sentiment)
पद /अर्थ (pada / artha – word /
meaning)
5
प्रणवमन्त्र / பிரணவமந்திரம் (praṇavamantra/ piraṇavamantiram)
अ / அ (a)
उ / உ (u)
म् /ம் (m)
6
परब्रह्म (parabrahma – absolute divinity)
सत् (sat - existence)
चित् (cit -consciousness)
आनन्द (ānanda - bliss)
Tne essential
synergies between these त्रयह् विमाः नाट्यस्य (trayah
vimāḥ nāṭyasya - three dimensions of dance) is very clearly explained by ஸ்ரீ சாத்தனார் (srī
sāttaṉār) in the தொகை நூல் (togai nūl) section of the கூத்தநூல் (kūttanūl –
dance scripture)
In other words, these त्रयह् विमाः नाट्यस्य (trayah vimāḥ nāṭyasya -
three dimensions of dance) correspond to
the त्रयह् देशविमाः (trayah deśavimāḥ - three
spatial dimensions) viz. length,
width & height that make up
the नाट्यारङ्ग /नटनसभा (nāṭyāraṅga / naṭanasabhā – dance
stage/hall) wherein the नाट्य (nāṭya - dance) is performed by the नर्तक (nartaka - dancer).
Please note that according to experts
the term ‘पल्लवि (pallavi – thematic line)’ is a thematic line of a poetic verse that is repetedly
rendred to the tune of a song. Technically speaking the term is actually an
acronym denoting the following concepts:
#
Acronym
Expansion
1
प (pa)
पदम् (padam - phrase)
2
ल्ल (lla)
लयम् (layam - tempo)
3
वि (vi)
विन्यासम् (vinyāsam - configuration)
Thus, these
are inseparable ingredients for any form of dance. For example, take the famous
शिवताण्डव
श्री नटराजस्य (śivatāṇḍava śrī naṭarājasya – auspiscious dance of
dance-king) wherein music forms an indispensable part the act. The noble
saint-poet திரு நாவுக்கரச நாயனார் (tiru nāvukkaraca nāyaṉār) in his soul-melting verses of
mystical poetry rendered at திரு அதிகை
வீரட்டானம் (tiru atikai vīraṭṭāṉam), describes the dance thus:
#
Category
प्रथम विमा (prathama vimā –
first dimension)
द्वितीय विमा (dvitīya vimā –
second dimension)
तृतीय विमा (tṛtīya vimā –
third dimension)
1
தமிழ் இலக்கியம் (tamiḻ ilakkiyam – Tamil literature)
நாடகம் (nāṭakam - drama)
இசை (isai - music)
இயல் (iyal - poetics)
2
भरतनाट्य (bharatanāṭya)
तालम् /தாளம் (tālam / tāḷam - beat)
नृत्य / ஆட்டம் (nṛtya / āṭṭam - dance)
रसम् /ரசம் (rasam – flavor / sentiment)
सङ्गीत / பாட்டம் (saṅgīta/ pāṭṭam - song)
भावम् /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood / emotion)
अभिनय / அவிநயம் (abhinaya
/ avinayam - expression)
3
कर्नाटक सङ्गीतम् (karnāṭaka saṅgītam – Carnatic music)
तालम् /தாளம் (tālam / tāḷam - beat)
रागम् /ராகம் /பண் (rāgam
/ paṇ - tune)
पल्लवि (pallavi – thematic line)
4
இயல் (iyal - poetics)
वर्ण (varṇa - letter)
रसम् /ரசம் (rasam – flavor / sentiment)
पद /अर्थ (pada / artha – word /
meaning)
5
प्रणवमन्त्र / பிரணவமந்திரம் (praṇavamantra/ piraṇavamantiram)
अ / அ (a)
उ / உ (u)
म् /ம் (m)
6
परब्रह्म (parabrahma – absolute divinity)
सत् (sat - existence)
चित् (cit -consciousness)
आनन्द (ānanda - bliss)
# |
Acronym |
Expansion |
1 |
प (pa) |
पदम् (padam - phrase) |
2 |
ल्ल (lla) |
लयम् (layam - tempo) |
3 |
वि (vi) |
विन्यासम् (vinyāsam - configuration) |
In fact, according to mythological accounts, all the gods including ब्रह्मा (brahmā), विष्णु (viṣṇu), सरस्वती (sarasvatī), पार्वती (pārvatī) & इन्द्र (indra) not only witnessed the शिवताण्डव श्री नटराजस्य (śivatāṇḍava śrī naṭarājasya – auspiscious dance of dance-king), but they also actively participated in the event by playing different musical instruments वीणा (vīṇā - lute), मृदङ्ग (mṛdaṅga - drum), मुरली (muralī - flute), etc., as part of the वाद्यवृन्द (vādyavṛnda - orchestra).
Interestingly, श्री रामभद्रदीक्षित (śrī rāmabhadradīkṣita) in his famous treatiseपतञ्जलिचरित (patañjalicarita) gives a very visually immersive account narrating the whole event thus explaining as to how
Sri C. Sivaramamurti, the eminent research scholar and author, in his famous book ‘Nataraja in art, theology and Literature’, further explains thus citing the above narrative of श्री रामभद्रदीक्षित (śrī rāmabhadradīkṣita):
“It is not only these great gods and goddesses, the creators in each his or her own important way, that are the witnesses to applaud the dance of Śiva, but they enthusiastically also join in creating the orchestra for him, by playing the musical instruments. At the very sign of his brow, Viṣṇu takes up the drum mardala, which, with its noble rumbling notes, like the cloud inspiring the blue-throated peacock to dance started the musical sound. With his lotus-hands, Brahmā takes up a pair of cymbals, ostensibly to keep time to the dance, of the victor of Kāma, but really because they allow his mistaking them for the breasts of his consort, Sarasvatī. Indra places the bamboo flute on his lip, the honey of which was lovingly tasted by the celestial nymph, Rambhā, and even by the excellence of his playing, which keeps the worlds spell-bound, Indra makes himself conspisious in his high station. Sarasvatī, the consort of Brahmā, beautifully plays the lute with the rosary placed on her left ear, as if to suggest a faster pace in the musical play. Pārvatī smiles at the impatience of her beloved one (Śiva) to dance, as he gets ready by tying up his locks with the long snake coil and his waist with the elephant hide. Śambhu, the kind-hearted, knowing that his dance festival was not to be comprehended by the mortal eye, graciously bestows the divine sight for those who lack it. Then the whole concourse witnesses the dance of Śiva, with the locks whirling around and lashing clusters of stars, as his feet with the serpent anklet, jingling at his thread, pushes down the earth.”
वैज्ञानिककला नटराज प्रतिकाविद्यायाः (vaijñānikakalā naṭarāja pratikāvidyāyāḥ - scientific art of the dance-king iconography)
We can separately deep dive into the cosmological significance of the iconography, separately sometime later, but for now I would like to quote here the narration of revered scientist and author Fritjoff Capra, who beautifully summarizes thus,
“Indian artists of the tenth and twelfth centuries have represented Shiva’s cosmic dance in magnificent bronze sculptures of dancing figures with four arms whose superbly balanced and yet dynamic gestures express the rhythm and unity of Life. The various meanings of the dance are conveyed by the details of these figures in a complex pictorial allegory. The upper right hand of the god holds a drum to symbolize the primal sound of creation, the upper left bears a tongue of flame, the element of destruction. The balance of the two hands represents the dynamic balance of creation and destruction in the world, accentuated further by the Dancer’s calm and detached face in the centre of the two hands, in which the polarity of creation and destruction is dissolved and transcended. The second right hand is raised in the sign of ‘do not fear’, symbolizing maintenance, protection and peace, while the remaining left hand points down to the uplifted foot which symbolizes release from the spell of maya. The god is pictured as dancing on the body of a demon, the symbol of man’s ignorance which has to be conquered before liberation can be attained
Shiva’s dance-in the words of Coomaraswamy- is ‘the clearest image of the activity of Cod which any art or religion can boast of’. As the god is a personification of Brahman, his activity is that of Brahman’s myriad manifestations in the world. The dance of Shiva is the dancing universe; the ceaseless flow of energy going through an infinite variety of patterns that melt into one another. Modern physics has shown that the rhythm of creation and destruction is not only manifest in the turn of the seasons and in the birth and death of all living creatures, but is also the very essence of inorganic matter. According to quantum field theory, all interactions between the constituents of matter take place through the emission and absorption of virtual particles. More than that, the dance of creation and destruction is the basis of the very existence of matter, since all material particles ‘self-interact’ by emitting and reabsorbing virtual particles. Modern physics has thus revealed that every subatomic particle not only performs an energy dance, but also is an energy dance; a pulsating process of creation and destruction. The patterns of this dance are an essential aspect of each particle’s nature and determine many of its properties. For example, the energy involved in the emission and absorption of virtual particles is equivalent to a certain amount of mass which contributes to the mass of the self-interacting particle. Different particles develop different patterns in their dance, requiring different amounts of energy, and hence have different masses. Virtual particles, finally, are not only an essential part of all particle interactions and of most of the particles’ properties, but are also created and destroyed by the vacuum. Thus, not only matter, but also the void, participates in the cosmic dance, creating and destroying energy patterns without end.
For the modern physicists, then, Shiva’s dance is the dance of subatomic matter. As in Hindu mythology, it is a continual dance of creation and destruction involving the whole cosmos; the basis of all existence and of all natural phenomena. Hundreds of years ago, Indian artists created visual images of dancing Shivas in a beautiful series of bronzes. In our time, physicists have used the most advanced technology to portray the patterns of the cosmic dance. The bubble-chamber photographs of interacting particles, which bear testimony to the continual rhythm of creation and destruction in the universe, are visual images of the dance of Shiva equalling those of the Indian artists in beauty and profound significance. The metaphor of the cosmic dance thus unifies ancient mythology, religious art, and modern physics. It is indeed, as Coomaraswamy has said, ‘poetry, but none the less science”.
The next important point
to understand is that नाट्य (nāṭya - dance) is yogic in nature as it demands perfect synchornization
even at bio-psychic levels, in terms of coordinated synergies between different
organs of the body viz. हस्ताः (hastāḥ - hands), टङ्गाः (ṭaṅgāḥ - legs), नेत्राः (netrāḥ - eyes), मुख (mukha - face) and the in
fact, सर्वाङ्गाः (sarvāṅgāḥ - all organs) in a seamless synchronization between the त्रयह् विमाः नाट्यस्य (trayah vimāḥ nāṭyasya -
three dimensions of dance) viz. नृत्य /ஆட்டம் (nṛtya / āṭṭam - dance), सङ्गीत / பாட்டம் (saṅgīta/ pāṭṭam - song) & अभिनय /அவிநயம் (abhinaya / avinayam - expression).
The salient features of योग नाट्यस्य (yoga nāṭyasya- yoga of dance) is very clearly explained by श्रीमति मीनाक्षिदेवी (śrīmati mīnākṣidevī – Smt Meenakshi Devi), the eminent subject matter expert as a practising dancer as well as a yogi and has been awarded by the prestigious கலைமாமணி விருது (kalaimāmaṇi virudu – expert-artist award). According to her:
“Bharatanatyam is a Yoga, if Yoga means union. For surely this ancient art is one of the most beautiful and satisfying ways of expressing the human longing for union with the Divine. As an art form, Bharatanatyam demands conscious understanding of body, mind and emotions. The sincere dancer must understand the nature of Bhakti and Jnana and the innate longing in all living creatures for Samadhi or cosmic consciousness. The ‘Divine dance of energy’ in the universe, so graphically and beautifully represented by Lord Nataraja, the lord of dance is the source of inspiration for all Bharatanatyam artists who understand the deeper aspects of their art. Especially for the youth, this Divine art is a boon for it shapes the body into graceful controlled beauty, the mind into alertness and sensitivity and the emotions into controlled and purified receptors for the deepest inner longings of humankind. Lord Shiva himself blesses those young people, who take to this art, offering their profound interest, their love and their discipline as Dakshina. Such true Sadhaks then find that Satyam, Shivam and Sundaram – truth, goodness and beauty do flower in their lives, boons granted gladly by the lord of dance to his ardent devotees.”
Interestingly, मुद्राः (mudrāḥ - gestures) & करणाः (karaṇāḥ- poses) are integral to योग नाट्यस्य (yoga nāṭyasya- yoga of
dance) just as in the case of traditional हट योगसाधन (haṭa yogasādhana). For example, in the case of former, हस्त मुद्राः (hasta mudrāḥ - hand
gestures) there are recognized to be around द्वादश प्राण लक्षणानि (dvādaśa prāṇa lakṣaṇāni –
twelve vital charecteristics) which are
further classified into various types each of which could be either सम्युथ हस्थ मुद्र (samyutha hastha mudra –
in-conjuction hand gesture) involving
both hands or असम्युथ हस्थ मुद्र (asamyutha hastha mudra –
not-in-conjuction hand gesture).
Similarly, नाट्य करणाः (nāṭya karaṇāḥ - hand movements) represent synchronous movements of the body organs especially it is a coordinated movement between हस्ताः (hastāḥ - hands) & टङ्गाः (ṭaṅgāḥ - legs). And combination of द्वकरणे (dvakaraṇe – two movements) constitute a मातृका (mātṛkā – expressive unit); and the permutation-combination of two or more मातृकाः (mātṛkāḥ – expressive units) form what is called as अङ्गहाराः (aṅgahārāḥ - gesticulation)
There are around the अष्टोत्तरशत नाट्य करणाः (aṣṭottaraśata nāṭya karaṇāḥ - hundred and eight dance poses) that are defined by श्री भरतमुनि (śrī bharatamuni) as part of the ताण्डवलक्षण (tāṇḍavalakṣaṇa – frantic dance charecteristics) in his magnum opus masterpiece – the भरतनाट्यशास्त्र (bharatanāṭyaśāstra).
For example, श्री भरतमुनि (śrī bharatamuni) in his नाट्यशास्त्र (nāṭyaśāstra – dance scripture) lists the following as the अष्टोत्तरशत नाट्य करणाः (aṣṭottaraśata nāṭya karaṇāḥ - hundred and eight dance poses)
Interestingly these अष्टोत्तरशत नाट्य करणाः (aṣṭottaraśata nāṭya karaṇāḥ
- hundred and eight dance poses) can be
found as artistically crafted sculptural wonders on the walls of many Hindu
temple structures including but not limited to the following major ones. In
fact, Dr. Padma Subramaniyam, the eminent dancer and subject matter expert did
a major research titled “Karaṇa in
Indian Sculpture”
# |
Temple |
Temple-Town |
1 |
சிதம்பரேஷ்வரர் /चिदम्बरेश्वर् (citamparēṣvarar / cidambareśvar) |
சிதம்பரம் / चिदम्बरम् (cidambaram / cidambaram) |
2 |
அருணாச்சலேஸ்வரர் / अरुणाचलेश्वर् (aruṇācaleśvar / aruṇācalesvarar) |
திரு அண்ணாமலை / श्री अरुणगिरि (tiru aṇṇāmalai / śrī aruṇagiri) |
3 |
சாரங்கபாணி / सारङ्गपाणि (sāraṅgapāṇi / sāraṅgapāṇi) |
கும்பகோணம் / कुंभकोण (kumpakōṇam /kuṃbhakoṇa) |
4 |
விருதகிரீஸ்வரர்/ वृद्धगिरीश्वर् (virutakirīsvarar / vṛddhagirīśvar) |
விருதாசலம் / वृद्धाचल (virutācalam / vṛddhācala) |
For instance, the अष्टोत्तरशत नाट्य करणाः (aṣṭottaraśata nāṭya karaṇāḥ - hundred and eight dance poses) are inscribed on the प्राच्य च पूर्वेतर गोपुर द्वाराः चिदम्बरक्षेत्रस्य (prācya ca pūrvetara gopura dvārāḥ cidambarakṣetrasya - eastern and western tower gates of Chidambaram Temple).
Although high importance is given to all the अष्टोत्तरशत नाट्य करणाः (aṣṭottaraśata nāṭya karaṇāḥ - hundred and eight dance poses), yet according to, yet the iconography of நடராஜர் (nataraajar) for example does not directly occur in the அஷ்டாஷ்ட மூர்திகள் (ashtaashta mUrthigaL – sixty four icons) listing from above table. However, it is mentioned in the listing of the कारणागम (kāraṇāgama). The next important point to understand is that some of these மூர்திகள் (mUrthigaL – icons) further take various forms. According to the शैव आगम शास्त्र (śaiva āgama śāstra) there are सप्त ताण्डव (sapta tāṇḍava – seven fold dances) performed by நடராஜர் (nataraajar)
Various literature based on शैव आगम शास्त्र (śaiva āgama śāstra) including शिव पराक्रम (śiva parākrama), शिल्प शास्त्र (śilpa śāstra), मयमदम् (mayamadam), कारणागम (kāraṇāgama), शिल्प रत्न (śilpa ratna), சகளாதிகாரம் (sakalaadhikaaram) etc., have further extended these basic forms of विग्रह (vigraha - idol) to a wider number of variations in their திருகோலங்கள் (thirukOlangaL – Divine poses). The शिल्प शास्त्र (śilpa śāstra), சகளாதிகாரம் (sakalaadhikaaram) & मयमदम् (mayamadam) for example refer to षोदश मूर्ति (ṣodaśa mūrti - sixteen icons) while the कारणागम (kāraṇāgama) extends it to पञ्चविंसति मूर्ति (pañcaviṁsati mūrti – twenty five icons) and शिव पराक्रम (śiva parākrama) extends the list to அஷ்டாஷ்ட மூர்திகள் (ashtaashta mUrthigaL – sixty four icons).
# | ताण्डव (tāṇḍava - dance) | Associated शिवालय (śivālaya) |
1 | कालिका ताण्डव (kālikā tāṇḍava) | திருனெல்வேலி தாமிர சபை (thirunelvEli thaamira sabai) |
2 | गौरी ताण्डव (gaurī tāṇḍava) | திருபத்தூர் சிற்சபை (thirpaththUr siRsabai) |
3 | सन्ध्या ताण्डव (sandhyā tāṇḍava) | மதுரை வெள்ளி சபை (madhurai veLLi sabai) |
4 | संहार ताण्डव (saṁhāra tāṇḍava) | திருகடவூர் (thirukadavUr) |
5 | ऊर्द्व ताण्डव (ūrdva tāṇḍava) | திருவாலங்காடு ரத்தின சபை (thiruvaalangaadu raththina sabai) |
6 | त्रिपुर ताण्डव (tripura tāṇḍava) | திருகுற்றால சித் சபை (thirukuRRaala chith sabai) |
7 | आनन्द ताण्डव (ānanda tāṇḍava) | தில்லை சிற்சபை (thillai ciRsabai) |
Some scripture further extends this to द्वदश (dvadaśa – twelvefold) listing which includes the following आनन्द ताण्डव (ānanda tāṇḍava), सन्ध्या ताण्डव (sandhyā tāṇḍava), ऊर्द्व ताण्डव (ūrdva tāṇḍava), कालिका ताण्डव (kālikā tāṇḍava), त्रिपुर ताण्डव (tripura tāṇḍava), संहार ताण्डव (saṁhāra tāṇḍava), स्रिङ्गार ताण्डव (sriṅgāra tāṇḍava), प्रलय ताण्डव (pralaya tāṇḍava), भूत ताण्डव (bhūta tāṇḍava), शुद्ध ताण्डव (śuddha tāṇḍava), उग्र ताण्डव (ugra tāṇḍava), भुजङ्ग ताण्डव (bhujaṅga tāṇḍava).
In கூத்தநூல் (kūttanūl), the following pairs of द्वादश नाट्यकरणाः (dvādaśa nāṭyakaraṇāḥ - twelve dance
movements) are given
special importance in terms of प्रतिकाविद्या नटराजस्य (pratikāvidyā naṭarājasya – iconography of Nataraja). The following verse testifies the same:
As
summarized in the table below, these द्वादश नाट्यकरणाः (dvādaśa nāṭyakaraṇāḥ - twelve dance
movements) can be mapped
to the द्वादश ताण्डवाः नटराजस्य (dvādaśa tāṇḍavāḥ naṭarājasya – twelve
dances of dance-king) mentioned in the शैवागम शास्त्र (śaivāgama śāstra).
# |
नाट्यकरण (nāṭyakaraṇa - dance act) |
ताण्डव
/தாண்டவம் (tāṇḍava
/ tāṇḍavam - dance) |
|
List -1 as per verse 41 |
List -2 as per verse 42 |
||
1 |
அல்லியம் (alliyam) |
கொட்டம் (koṭṭam) |
आनन्द ताण्डव /ஆனந்தத் தாண்டவம் (ānanda tāṇḍava / āṉandat tāṇḍavam) |
2 |
எல்லியம் (elliyam) |
சந்தி (sandi) |
सन्ध्या ताण्डव /சந்த்யா தாண்டவம் (sandhyā tāṇḍava / santyā tāṇḍavam) |
3 |
பல்லியம் (palliyam) |
ஒட்டரம் (oṭṭaram) |
शुद्ध ताण्डव / சுத்த தாண்டவம் (śuddha tāṇḍava / sudda tāṇḍavam) |
4 |
உள்ளம் (uḷḷam) |
காமம் (kāmam) |
शृङ्कार ताण्डव / ஸ்ருங்கார
தாண்டவம் (śṛṅkāra tāṇḍava / sruṅgāra tāṇḍavam) |
5 |
நுதல் விழி (nutal viḻi) |
முப்புரம் (muppuram) |
त्रिपुर ताण्डव / திரிபுர தாண்டவம் (tripura tāṇḍava / tiripura tāṇḍavam) |
6 |
நுதல் கால் (nutal kāl) |
சுட்டி (cuṭṭi) |
ऊर्धव ताण्डव / ஊர்தவ தாண்டவம் (ūrdhava tāṇḍava / ūrdava tāṇḍavam) |
7 |
நோக்கம் (nōkkam) |
விந்தரம் (vintaram) |
मुनि ताण्डव / முனி தாண்டவம் (muni tāṇḍava / muṉi tāṇḍavam) |
8 |
நுணுக்கம் (nuṇukkam) |
சங்கரம் (caṅkaram) |
संहार ताण्डव / சம்ஹார தாண்டவம் (saṃhāra tāṇḍava / samhāra tāṇḍavam) |
9 |
கால் வரி (kāl vari) |
கொட்டி (koṭṭi) |
प्रलय ताण्डव / பிரளய தாண்டவம் (pralaya tāṇḍava / piraḷaya tāṇḍavam) |
10 |
பேய் வரி (pēy vari) |
பண்டரம் (paṇṭaram) |
भूत ताण्डव / பூத தாண்டவம் (bhūta tāṇḍava / pūta tāṇḍavam) |
11 |
களிற்று உரி (kaḷiṟṟu uri) |
குஞ்சரம் (kuñcaram) |
उर्ग्र ताण्डव / உக்கிர தாண்டவம் (urgra tāṇḍava / ukkira tāṇḍavam) |
12 |
நச்சம் (naccam) |
கந்தரம் (kantaram) |
भुजङ्ग ताण्डव /புஜங்க தாண்டவம் (bhujaṅga tāṇḍava / bujaṅga tāṇḍavam) |
Thus far, we have been looking into the physical aspects of harmony in dance, we shall next quickly look at the emotional synergies as well. To this end, let’s start with रस (rasa - sentiment) one of the fundamental building blocks of emotions. Accordig to classical definition, there are अष्टविध रसाः (aṣṭavidha rasāḥ - eightfold sentiments) including the four primary ones viz. शृङ्गार /காமம் (śṛṅgāra / kāmam - erotic), रौद्र/இழிப்பு (raudra / iḻippu – furious /contention),वीर /விறல் (vīra / viṟal - heroic) & बीभत्स / வெறுப்பு (bībhatsa / veṟuppu - odious), as well as their corresponding derivatives viz. अस्य /நகை (asya / nagai - comic), करुण /இரக்கம் (karuṇa / irakkam – compassionate / pathetic), अद्भुत /வியப்பு (adbhuta - marvel) & भय/அச்சம் (bhaya / accam – terrible / fear) respectively, as enumerated by श्री भरतमुनि (śrī bharatamuni) in the following verses:
Sometimes शान्ति /நடுவுநிலை (śānti / naṭuvunilai - tranquility) is added to these अष्टविध रसाः (aṣṭavidha rasāḥ - eightfold sentiments) by experts and commentators including परमाचार्य श्री अभिनवगुप्त (paramācārya śrī abhinavagupta), thereby making them नवरसाः (navarasāḥ - nine sentiments). Similarly, in the கூத்தநூல் (kūttanūl – dance scripture) written by ஸ்ரீ சாத்தனார் (srī sāttaṉār) provides the following சுவைதொகை (suvaitogai – sentiment list) in the section சுவைநூல் (suvainūl – sentiment book):
Now these नवरसाः (navarasāḥ - nine sentiments) eventually leads to various kinds of भावा /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood / emotion) including the corresponding नवभावाः (navabhāvāḥ - nine moods). For example, this table maps the two based on the
mappings in the भरतनाट्यशास्त्र (bharatanāṭyaśāstra) & கூத்தநூல் (kūttanūl)
# |
रस /ரசம் (rasa / rasam - sentiment) |
भावा /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood / emotion) |
1 |
शृङ्गार /காமம் (śṛṅgāra / kāmam - erotic) |
रति / ஊக்கம் (rati
- delight) |
2 |
अस्य /நகை (asya / nagai - comic) |
हस / குறுக்கம் (hasa
/ kuṟukkam - laughter) |
3 |
करुण / இரக்கம் (karuṇa / irakkam – compassionate /
pathetic) |
शोक / தேப்பம் (śoka / tēppam - sorrow) |
4 |
रौद्र / இழிப்பு (raudra / iḻippu – furious
/contention) |
क्रोध / சினப்பிடை (krodha / ciṉappiṭai - hatred) |
5 |
वीर /விறல் (vīra / viṟal - heroic) |
उत्सह / இச்சை (utsaha / iccai - zeal) |
6 |
भय /அச்சம் (bhaya / accam – terrible / fear) |
भय / மயக்கம் (bhaya / mayakkam - fear) |
7 |
अद्भुत /வியப்பு (adbhuta - marvel) |
विस्मय /ஒடுக்கம் (vismaya / oṭukkam -
wonder) |
8 |
बीभत्स /வெறுப்பு (bībhatsa / veṟuppu - odious) |
जुगुप्सा /திணக்கம் (jugupsā / tiṇakkam -
disgust) |
9 |
शान्ति /நடுவுநிலை (śānti / naṭuvunilai -
tranquility) |
शान्ति /அமைதி (śānti / amaidi naṭuvunilai - peace) |
Of course, this is not an
exhaustive list of all possible human emotions. However, this list is highly
representing of most important emotions expressed by humans. The important
point to understand is the psychological relation between रस /ரசம் (rasa / rasam - sentiment) & भावा /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood / emotion). According
to subject matter experts, the former is an atomic instance of the latter. In
other words, रस /ரசம் (rasa / rasam - sentiment) is an emotion of a person during a particular instance of time, whereas a भावा /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood) reflects the sustained impact of the same emotion carried on for a longer
time frame. Thus, former is considered as a बिज (bija - seed) which when
sustained and nurtured, grows into a larger वृक्षक
(vṛkṣaka - plant) called भावा /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood). Please not that the கூத்தநூல் (kūttanūl – dance scripture) formally refers भावा /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood) by the term ‘அகம் (agam)’ and explains its nature
of synergies between रस /ரசம் (rasa / rasam - sentiment) and both these are physical coordination of different parts of the
dancer’s body during dance performance.
अभिनय (abhinaya – histrionic expression) is the next important aspect in the कला नाट्यस्य (kalā nāṭyasya – art of dance) and in the lines of भावा /பாவம் (bhāvam – mood) & रस /ரசம் (rasa / rasam - sentiment) that we just touched upon. Well, but what exactly is अभिनय (abhinaya – histrionic expression)? श्री भरतमुनि (śrī bharatamuni) defines it thus, deriving from its etymological roots in the following verses:
Here, in the above
definition, the term ‘शाखा (śākhā - limb)’ referes to the करवर्तना (karavartanā – hand
gesticulation), while अङ्ग (aṅga - organ) corresponds to head, hands,
breast, sides, waist and feet, and उपाङ्ग (upāṅga – sub-organ) corresponds to eyes, eyebrows,
nose, lips and chin.
Hence नाट्य (nāṭya - dance), in this sense, is a योग यज्ञसाधन (yoga yajñasādhana - yogic sacrificial rite) synchronizing the different organs in the भूत देह (bhūta deha – material body), मनस् (manas - mind) and the आत्मन् (ātman - soul). This fact is very beautifully expressed by ஸ்ரீ சாத்தனார் (srī sāttaṉār) in his famous poetic treatise கூத்தநூல் (kūttanūl – dance scripture)
Again, this is why Dr. Sri Kapila Vatsyayan, the eminent scholar and subject matter expert explains the synergies between them thus:
“The dramatic spectacle [nāṭya], like the yajña, has a moral and ethical purpose. It will conduce moral duty (dharma), wealth economic well-being (artha), refme sensibilities (kāma) and lead to liberation (mokṣa). The arts are thus an alternate, if not a parallel, path for the avowed goals of a culture which move concurrently on the three levels of the adhibhautika (material), adhyatmika (individual soul and self) and adhidaivika (metaphysical divine). The multidimentional nature is evident, even if not explicitly stated”.
No comments:
Post a Comment